You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #180: I don't think the Dem party wanted to be out in the wilderness 4 more [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #164
180. I don't think the Dem party wanted to be out in the wilderness 4 more
years, hoping Hillary would run...That's too far a stretch even for my "tinfoilhat" mind. I think that was the RW putting that out to whip up the Clinton/Hillary hate.

It's not that I don't think the DLC would have loved to have a Clinton, but she wouldn't run. She's just used as a threat. It's just to much of a stretch to have our party ruined just so Hillary could run. Who would be left to vote for her with an imploded party coming off two stolen elections??

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC