Reply #7: Thanks Steve--- [View All]

[CoffeeCat]

Hi Steve,

Thanks for the info. Like you, I agree that the Iowa vote is most likely sound. With an honest Democratic governor and SOS, it would be difficult for the Reps to pull off fraud in Iowa.

I'm mainly wondering how Iowans view the issue of election fraud--on a national level--in the 2004 race. I know there is a ton of concern from around the country on these matters. So, I'm wondering if Iowa Democratic groups or individual Democrats from Iowa--are concerned about Ohio, Fla and the countless other stories about 2004 election fraud.

I am considering a trip to DC on 1/06--to show my lack of support for the vote. The vote is certified on this date, and John Conyers (D-MI) will be protesting the certification and word has it that at least one senator will formally join him to protest the election results and refuse to certify the vote. If Conyers and at least one senator protests the vote--the election is thrown out and the vote for president goes to the House and Senate for a vote.

Of course the Republican tilt means a Bush win. However, it appears that Conyers has some pretty solid fraud evidence. Investigations have been ongoing for weeks. If his case is solid and overwhelming, it may put Republicans in a precarios position--do I vote for a fraudulent election or not? Things could get interesting.

I'm wondering if my fellow Iowans/Democrats are plugged into these happenings. I'd like to know their opinion about all of this. Do most Iowans believe the presidential elections were fair and legit?

I know many on the general DU boards are planning trips to DC for the 1/6 certification. I was also wondering if any Iowans are planning on making the trip as well.

Again, thanks for your comments Steve and I look forward to discussing these issues with other Iowa Dems.