Reply #52: Well, mistwell, there's you and then there's... [View All]

[Peace Patriot]

Josh Mitteldorf, Ph.D. - Temple University Statistics Department
Steven F. Freeman, PhD - Center for Organizational Dynamics, University of Pennsylvania
Brian Joiner, PhD - Prof. of Statistics and Director of Statistical Consulting (ret), University of Wisconsin
Frank Stenger, PhD in mathematics - School of Computing, University of Utah
Richard G. Sheehan, PhD - Department of Finance, University of Notre Dame
Elizabeth Liddle, MA - (UK) PhD candidate at the University of Nottingham
Paul F. Velleman, Ph.D. - Department of Statistical Sciences, Cornell University
Victoria Lovegren, Ph.D. - Department of Mathematics, Case Western Reserve University
Campbell B. Read, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus, Department of Statistical Science, Southern Methodist University
Kathy Dopp, MS in mathematics - USCountVotes, President
Also Peer Reviewed by USCountVotes’ core group of statisticians and independent reviewers, at: (exit poll analysis - 1 in 10 million odds against Bush win)
http://uscountvotes.org/ucvAnalysis/US/USCountVotes_Re_Mitofsky-Edison.pdf

Exit poll analysis: astronomical odds against Bush win
Dr. Steven Freeman: http://www.appliedresearch.us/sf/epdiscrep.htm
Dr. Ron Baiman: http://www.freepress.org/departments/display/19/2004/997
Dr. Webb Mealy: http://www.selftest.net/redshift.htm
Jonathan Simon:http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0411/S00142.htm

Florida: 130,000 to 230,000 phantom votes for Bush--paper vs. electronic voting:
Dr. Michael Haut & UC Berkeley stats team: http://ucdata.berkeley.edu

Johns Hopkins report on insecurity of electronic voting:
http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0307/S00196.htm#5

Easy demo of the how insecure voting machines are:
http://www.chuckherrin.com/hackthevote.htm

"Myth Breakers: Facts About Electronic Elections" (2nd edition): www.votersunite.org

Ohio vote suppression: http://www.bpac.info

Documentation of widespread machine fraud and dirty tricks in over 20 states: http://www.flcv.com/ussumall.html

Democratic Underground (ignatzmouse):
(North Carolina: absentee ballot vs. electronic, inexplicable 9% edge to Bush in electronic:)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x45003
(also at:) http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/11/12/233831/06

Democratic Underground (TruthIsAl)l: "To believe Bush won, you have to believe…"

Part 1
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=1316010

Part 2
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=1358806

Part 3
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x197878

Democratic Underground (TruthIsAll): The Time Zone Discrepancy
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x318693

In progress compilations of various articles and materials on 2004 Election Fraud:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x311105

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=203&topic_id=304579

-------

The exit poll analyses are only one of numerous other indicators that Bush didn't win. The analyses are not solely based on who won the exit polls, but rather on the very weird skew in the exit polls toward Bush in the battleground states--a skew that is not explainable by any conceivable bias in the exit polling (bias in the exit polling would show up more or less evenly across the board). And when you look at all other sets of data, nothing to do with the exit polls, similar, inexplicable, large skews toward Bush appear--whether it's electronic vs. paper, top of the ticket vs. lower ticket, predictable vote vs. actual vote, or touchscreens always, without fail, changing Kerry votes to Bush votes, never the other way round.

In a predictable vote vs. actual vote analysis, Dr. Freeman adds up the large Democratic edge in new voter registration, 58% to 41% (!), the large jump from Nader to Kerry, and 2000 repeat voter statistics, and concludes that there were 4 to 8 million votes that Kerry should have gotten, and didn't get in the official tally. (Bush "won" by 3.5 million.)

But you only have to look at the DU (ignatzmouse) No. Carolina analysis--9% skew to Bush in electronic vs. absentee/early voting--to know that there was something very, very, very wrong with this election, and that the culprit is electronic voting systems, with their SECRET, proprietary programming code, owned and controlled by BushCon companies, who insisted on no paper trail. They were manufacturing and padding Bush's popular majority all over the country, even in states that they were going to win anyway.

The impossible (1 in 10 million odds) skew in the official tally vs. exit polls is just ADDITIONAL information in a MOUNTAIN OF EVIDENCE that the 2004 election was stolen.