Reply #22: after being tried [View All]

[Bluerthanblue]

in the court of public opinion- and propaganda.

Does it not seem odd to you that the FBI claims it has VIDEOTAPE of the man accepting $100,000, which they also claim they recovered 90,000 of, (with matching serial #'s) and audio tape that supposedly implicates him- and yet, they couldn't bring a case against him with THAT evidence????

Something really sounds off- big time here- really off.

They clearly had adequate evidence- they supposedly cut a deal with someone in his office, and they discovered the money last AUGUST????? WTF?

This isn't making sense- on any level- the FBI claims it couldn't get the 'evidence' it needed without raiding his office???? How much more evidence do they need if they truly have the video, audio, and recovered cash they claim they have????


I'm not claiming he is or isn't guilty- I'm asking what the hell is going on, and why aren't other people questioning the story being laid out???