Reply #9: A qualifier (update) to this post. [View All]

[mmonk]

In order to better qualify this, I don't want this seen as a "depends on what the meaning of is is" thread. Therefore the following:
1. If is does not mean is in the phrase "impeachment is off the table" as many say (investigations will lead to impeachment and is implied), then I have no issues with Pelosi's statements or the overall plan.
2. If is means is in the statement "impeachment is off the table" no matter what is in the investigations, I'm opposed to the plan.
3. If the plan is to pass legislation that is popular to get the president to accept or veto and see if there are enough votes to override for the next two years, I'm against it if there is no effort to hold them accountable.
4. If the request through inference is I should accept the plan to be a loyal democrat if it doesn't include a possibilty of impeachment, I'm disinclined to acquiesce to that request.
5. The part about voting them out if they don't hold them accountable was a request from Lindorf and Olshansky from an interview on book TV, not me. I'm a loyal democrat.

peace