You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #25: Actually, the jails in this country are full of non-violent drug offenders. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. Actually, the jails in this country are full of non-violent drug offenders.
Edited on Tue Dec-04-07 01:20 AM by impeachdubya
We spend $40 Billion a year on a "drug war" aimed primarily at not crack, but pot. We'd do far better if we legalized and taxed marijuana, and treated hard drugs as a health issue and not a law enforcement one. When people commit other crimes- like robbing or killing or (allegedly) "selling their babies" then they are criminals and should be treated as such. But right now we let violent criminals OUT of prison to make room for mandatory minimum non violent sentenced drug offenders. And the fact that drugs are illegal directly causes the violence associated with "the drug trade" just as alcohol prohibition was responsible for Al Capone.

As for church automatically being "better"- that's debatable. I spent a lot of time in my youth traveling around with the Grateful Dead, and many of the people I grew up with at those shows- on drugs or off- were and are far better fucking individuals than the glassy-eyed fundy assholes who voted for Bush, hate gays and think women who take the birth control pill should go to prison.

The bottom line? As with everything, what a consenting adult does with his or her own body and life should be HIS OR HER OWN BUSINESS, as long as they aren't harming or endangering anyone else. That goes for people who do drugs, that goes for people who drink alcohol, that goes for people who want to go to church, that goes for people who want to watch or be paid to appear in consenting adult porn.

If Crissy Moran found Jesus and gave up her $14K a month porn gig and is happy about it, good for her- but it's a pretentious value judgment (and this is my opinion, just as that is yours) to make a blanket statement that it's "better" for anyone and everyone to be a proseltyzing fundy than a porn star. Or that this world needs "more church and less drugs". Some fundies are happy, being a fundy works for them. Some porn stars are happy, being a porn star works for them. Some recreational drug users- and I would include alcohol as one of those recreational drugs- are happy, that works for them. Some clean and sober people -I'm one of them- are happy.

Personally, I think whatever works for people is their choice- as long as they're consenting adults and they aren't harming or endangering anyone else- and no one else's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC