You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #48: No, you know, I'm not. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #27
48. No, you know, I'm not.
In legal issues, which is what this is, precision of language is crucial. That's why you'll often find me picking nits in this type of discussion.

The person accused of rape or sexual assault also has rights. We have a very strong reason to require proof of guilt, not of innocence. The assumption that the accuser is correct is a violation of that requirement, no matter what the crime.

When you use a general "we" in your argument, your argument fails when some of those in the "we" group do not act as you say "we" do. Language (and logic) is funny that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC