Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BeyondGeography

BeyondGeography's Journal
BeyondGeography's Journal
February 4, 2026

Even the NY Post has had it with Krasnov's relentless Putin buttkissing

It’s time to hit lying Putin with LOTS of sticks

Vladimir Putin’s promised “weeklong” pause in strikes on Ukraine’s power plants lasted just four days; will the Russian thugocrat pay any price for yet again breaking his word? President Donald Trump announced from the Oval Office last Thursday that Putin had agreed to the pause as a humanitarian gesture amid a brutally cold winter. Supposedly, Moscow (suddenly) didn’t want to wage war on civilians.

Yet Tuesday’s barrage of 450 drones and 70 missiles, Russia’s largest such assault in nearly four years of war, aimed at the very infrastructure Vlad had claimed he wouldn’t target. Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky called this exactly what it is: “Moscow is choosing terror and escalation,” not peace. Putin broke his word to Trump, ruthlessly attacking civilians one day ahead of planned US-brokered negotiations in Abu Dhabi; will our president just take it?

When will the president show some rage at Putin’s nonstop lies and broken promises?…Months of jawboning (and feeding Putin’s ego by doing face-to-face talks) hasn’t gotten the monster of Moscow to budge an inch; Russia’s still bent on total conquest no matter how long, or how much blood on both sides, it takes.

… Since Vlad keeps spitting on carrots, Trump’s people should be hitting him with lots of sticks: Get Kyiv more offensive as well as defensive capabilities; squeeze Moscow’s energy industry as hard as it’s hitting Ukraine’s. Putin’s plainly laughing at Trump’s weak-seeming will; time to teach him what “peace through strength” really means.

https://nypost.com/2026/02/03/opinion/its-time-to-hit-lying-putin-with-lots-of-sticks/

January 31, 2026

Asking Brits if They'd Holiday in America

?si=aZWHYIc9VtMU-zZE
January 30, 2026

I'm so Bored with the USA - The Clash

?si=lH0AYqmxcu7CQt4p
January 27, 2026

Augustus Pablo - AP Special

?si=_6jshPZvJJikAAry
January 23, 2026

In which Chuck Schumer protects Howard Lutnick from a direct question about Trump's hypocrisy

This was at a groundbreaking ceremony last week in upstate Clay, New York, for Micron’s new memory manufacturing facility project which could ultimately consist of four labs, a total investment of $100 billion and create around 50,000 direct and indirect jobs.

The project was made possible by a $6.1 billion grant from President Joe Biden’s CHIPS Act which received paltry Republican support and has been criticized (though not scotched) by President Trump.

When Lutnick is asked why Trump should get any credit for jobs created by the Chips and Science Act, Schumer intervenes on behalf of Lutnick, who then ignores the question and gives a commercial for the Trump Administration.

The reporter gave Schumer a chance to tell the Democratic side of the story after the ceremony where his most memorable quote was, “Today’s a day for bipartisanship.”

The relevant portion of the clip runs from 3:59-9:59.

?si=iLSMzV4mqwVJ2-TK
January 23, 2026

Trump admits Europeans served in Afghanistan but "we never needed them"

And “they stayed a little back.”

What a piece of shit.

Trump prompts outrage with claim Nato troops avoided frontline in Afghanistan

Donald Trump has provoked outrage among British MPs and veterans after claiming Nato troops stayed away from the frontline in Afghanistan. The US president made his comments in an interview with Fox News in which he reiterated his suggestion that Nato would not support the US if asked.

His remarks drew condemnation from across the political spectrum, with critics pointing to the 457 British deaths in Afghanistan and highlighting Trump’s avoidance of military service in Vietnam. A total of 3,486 Nato troops died in the 20-year conflict, of which 2,461 were US service personnel. Canada suffered 165 deaths, including civilians. Denmark, which has been at loggerheads with the US over Trump’s designs on Greenland, had 44 combat deaths in Afghanistan, the most per capita outside the US.

In the interview with Fox News, Trump said: “We’ve never needed them. They’ll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan … and they did, they stayed a little back, a little off the frontlines.” Calvin Bailey, a Labour MP and former RAF officer who served alongside US special operations units in Afghanistan, said Trump’s claim “bears no resemblance to the reality experienced by those of us who served there”. The Conservative MP Ben Obese-Jecty, who served in Afghanistan as a captain in the Royal Yorkshire Regiment, said it was “sad to see our nation’s sacrifice, and that of our Nato partners, held so cheaply by the president of the United States”.

…Stephen Stewart, a former soldier and an author and journalist, said: “Trump’s comments are as offensive as they are inaccurate. It’s hugely ironic that someone who allegedly dodged the draft for the Vietnam war should make such a disgraceful statement…The Liberal Democrat leader, Ed Davey, said on X: “Trump avoided military service 5 times. How dare he question their sacrifice. Farage and all the others still fawning over Trump should be ashamed.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/23/donald-trump-outrage-nato-troops-avoided-afghanistan-frontline?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Profile Information

Gender: Male
Hometown: NY
Member since: Mon Dec 29, 2003, 11:41 PM
Number of posts: 40,925
Latest Discussions»BeyondGeography's Journal